Artificial intelligence is rapidly reshaping the landscape of scientific research, moving beyond simple tools to potentially becoming a new form of scientific entity. What began with early automated experiments, like the robot “Adam” in the 2000s, has evolved into AI systems contributing to Nobel Prize-winning breakthroughs and accelerating discovery across diverse fields. While skepticism remains, the pace of advancement suggests that AI’s role in science is no longer hype—it’s reality.

The Evolution of AI in Research

Early AI applications mimicked human researchers, like Adam, which formulated questions and tested them in a robotic lab. Today, more sophisticated AI agents, powered by models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, break down complex problems into actionable steps and leverage vast datasets to provide in-depth answers. Researchers in pharmaceuticals, materials science, and quantum computing are already using these systems to accelerate discovery. The 2024 Nobel Prizes in chemistry and physics acknowledge the growing importance of AI tools, but the true shift is still unfolding.

AI as a Research Partner: Current Strengths and Limitations

Currently, AI excels at searching within defined boundaries, sifting through massive datasets to identify obscure patterns and connections. Large language models (LLMs) behind chatbots have access to an unprecedented amount of text, including research papers in multiple languages. However, true scientific breakthroughs often require thinking outside the box—something current AI struggles with.

The challenge isn’t access to information, but the ability to generate truly novel ideas. Human creativity and imagination remain vital for leaps of insight, like the theory of continental drift or special relativity. AI can augment human discovery but cannot yet replicate it entirely.

Breakthroughs: From Black Hole Symmetries to New Drugs

Despite its limitations, AI is already making tangible contributions. Theoretical physicist Alex Lupsasca discovered that OpenAI’s GPT-5 pro agent could independently identify symmetries in black hole equations, verifying his earlier work. Mathematician Ernest Ryu collaborated with ChatGPT on a proof in optimization theory, finding that a common method always converges on a single solution after 12 hours of back-and-forth.

The key is not replacement, but collaboration. Scientists like Lupsasca and Ryu are joining AI companies (OpenAI) to push the boundaries further, viewing AI not as a competitor, but as an essential research partner.

The Risk of “Junk Science” and the Need for Better Tools

The proliferation of AI-generated content raises concerns about quality. Critics like Gary Marcus of NYU warn that LLMs can easily produce “junk science,” including fake research papers churned out by paper mills. Journals have already begun rejecting AI-generated submissions due to low quality.

To mitigate this, researchers are moving toward “stacked boxes”—combining general AI agents with specialized tools that ensure accuracy, such as knowledge graphs. This approach is proving effective in drug discovery and materials science. Insilico Medicine, for example, used AI to identify a protein linked to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and designed a drug molecule to block it, currently in clinical trials.

The Future: AI Building Its Own Research Framework

The ultimate goal is to enable AI to build its own research framework—to define its own questions, design experiments, and analyze data with minimal human intervention. Projects like AutoRA (social science research) and Code Scientist (computer science research) are early steps in this direction. These systems recombine existing knowledge to generate novel experiments and analyze results autonomously.

While these systems aren’t yet making world-shattering discoveries, they signal a shift toward true AI-driven science. The challenge remains refining these tools, ensuring creativity, and preventing the generation of flawed or misleading conclusions.

AI’s impact on scientific discovery is undeniable. From assisting human researchers to potentially becoming autonomous scientific entities, the future of science is inextricably linked with the evolution of artificial intelligence.